1234money official logo1234money

Command Ctrl

Stream the signal

  • الرئيسية
  • برنامج تلفزيوني
  • فيلم
  • رسوم متحركة
  • VSKit
  • الأكثر مشاهدة
  • تطبيق 1234money
  • FM Download
  • Games
  • Old 1234money
English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
1234money Download Appتطبيق
تطبيق
عرض المزيد1234money home light arrow
1234money downloadاستمتع بأفلام وبرامج بلا حدود
1234money downloadحمل ما تحب وشاهد بدون إنترنت
1234money downloadواجهة بسيطة وأداء سلس
امسح رمز الاستجابة السريعة للتنزيل أو
تحميل 1234money
For phones and tablets
TV
1234money TV APK
لأجهزة Android TV
1234money header navigation
1234money official logo

1234money

1234money search icon
Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

★ 6.42015Movie1 h 0 mالمملكة المتحدة
فيلم وثائقيجريمة

When the 21-year-old Amanda Knox from Seattle takes the stand next week, she will have the biggest audience of her life. The whole world will be watching.

52 people rated
🔇

Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

2015

R

1 h 0 m

المملكة المتحدة

فيلم وثائقي

جريمة

When the 21-year-old Amanda Knox from Seattle takes the stand next week, she will have the biggest audience of her life. The whole world will be watching.
More

6.4 /10

52 people rated

شاهد أونلاين

شاهد في التطبيق

share

الحلقات

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex

العرض الفرعي

play
أفضل الممثلين(18)
starring avatar
Tina Daheley
Self - Narrator
default avatar
David Balding
Self - DNA Statistician
default avatar
Valter Biscotti
Self - Rudy Guede's Lawyer
default avatar
Giulia Bongiorno
Self - Raffaele Sollecito's Lawyer
default avatar
Anne Bremner
Self - Friends of Amanda Knox Campaign
default avatar
Manuela Comodi
Self - Prosecutor
default avatar
Giancarlo Costagliola
Self - Prosecutor
default avatar
Sarah Gino
Self - Knox Defence Forensic Biologist
default avatar
Lyle Kercher
Self - Meredith's Brother
default avatar
Stephanie Kercher
Self - Meredith's Sister
starring avatar
Amanda Knox
Self
default avatar
Curt Knox
Self - Amanda's Father
starring avatar
Patrick Lumumba
Self - Bar Owner
default avatar
Francesco Maresca
Self - Kercher Family Lawyer
default avatar
Giuliano Mignini
Self - Prosecutor
default avatar
Francesco Sollecito
Self
default avatar
Raffaele Sollecito
Self
default avatar
Patrizia Stefanoni
Self - Police Forensic Biologist

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

Omi__ ❤️

31/07/2024 19:19
Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Larrywheels

29/05/2023 11:24
source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

💥

23/05/2023 04:11
This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.
author avatar

Arf Yldrım

19/05/2023 04:08
Moviecut—Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Hadeel

13/04/2023 10:32
source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Theophilus Mensah

13/04/2023 10:32
This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.
— No more content —

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

Omi__ ❤️

31/07/2024 19:19
Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Larrywheels

29/05/2023 11:24
source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

💥

23/05/2023 04:11
This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.
author avatar

Arf Yldrım

19/05/2023 04:08
Moviecut—Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Hadeel

13/04/2023 10:32
source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?
author avatar

Theophilus Mensah

13/04/2023 10:32
This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.
— No more content —
إخلاء المسؤولية: جميع مقاطع الفيديو والصور على 1234money مأخوذة من الإنترنت، وحقوق نشرها محفوظة لأصحابها الأصليين. نحن نقدم خدمات صفحات الويب فقط، ولا نخزن أو نسجل أو نرفع أي محتوى.
حول 1234money:إصدار الرابط الرسمي 1234.money|تحميل 1234money APK|سياسة الخصوصية|اتفاقية المستخدم
© 2026 1234money. All rights reserved.Telegram
1234money official logo

1234money

English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
حول 1234money
إصدار الرابط الرسميتحميل 1234money APKسياسة الخصوصيةاتفاقية المستخدم
إخلاء المسؤولية: جميع مقاطع الفيديو والصور على 1234money مأخوذة من الإنترنت، وحقوق نشرها محفوظة لأصحابها الأصليين. نحن نقدم خدمات صفحات الويب فقط، ولا نخزن أو نسجل أو نرفع أي محتوى.