Absolutely, mind-numbingly dire. After four years of grinding war.... immaculate uniforms and equipment? Incoherent dialogue, mumbled lines, wooden acting. It's not even school-play standard. Could I do any better? I'm not a director, nor a producer, nor an actor... but at least I'd try. I'd make an effort. No-one connected with this movie did.

The film was produced, directed, and written by the same person. Takes a rare talent to do that successfully. Sadly, he is not that rare talent. This was obviously done on a shoe string budget. The direction is abysmal and the acting is robotic. It is devoid of any emotion and the lines are delivered without any enthusiasm or emotion; almost monosyllabic. The battle scenes appear to be done by re-enactment hobbyists. There is only one scene where the combatants raise the rebel yell. For comparison, the battle scenes in "Gettysburg" were done with mostly hobbyists. There is no background information provided as to the characters and one is left to surmise that the animosity Gen. KilPatrick had against Gen. Wheeler may be just the Union/Confederate thing; although it hints there may be more stemming back to their days at West Point. The film is disjointed, has low production values, and poor acting. Unless you are a HARD CORE civil war buff, give it a pass.

Watched for about 10 minutes. A boring re-enactment film. When they were firing rifles, they were pointing most at the sky. Probably shot mire ducks than soldiers.

Right, and this is exactly what happens when you let people bring a video camera to a Civil War re-enactment event. Yup, that is exactly what "Kill Cavalry" felt like. I must admit that when I sat down to watch this 2021 movie, despite of having seen the very low IMDb rating, I was expecting more of a proper movie with an actual storyline and you know, acting... Instead, I was treated to some lousy Civil War re-enactment filming. And sure, I will say that the costumes and props definitely looked good and realistic, but that was about all the enjoyment there was to this "movie". People didn't even fall down to die or become wounded, but of course when people were firing all their weapons at an angle aimed well above the heads of any enemies, aiming at tree canopies, then of course, how can people die? If you enjoy American Civil War movies, like I do, then you need to spare yourself the suffering and anguish that is "Kill Cavalry". This movie was just so horrible it is almost beyond words. Needless to say that I didn't even make it past the first massive skirmish in the forest, where everyone was shooting at the trees, no one fell down dead, and everything felt like they were just shooting at nothing and nobody. Yeah, this was more than enough to make me lose absolute interest in the rest of the movie. It was just atrociously bad. And watching something that felt like a homemade video brought to a Civil War re-enactment event if not really within the scopes of my interest. I am rating this abysmal thing of a movie a mere one out of ten stars, and that is solely based on the costumes and props. Sometimes things are better left on the drawing board.

More like a reenactment of the Civil War than a movie. Watch it if you like reenactments of the Civil War otherwise skip.

Ten minutes of that first battle and everyone firing into the air! No casualties then two aunties start wandering onto the battlefield. This collection of crap should be avoided due to lack of logic or historical significance! Was there some kind of meeting where adults actually got together and discussed the film, asked some first graders for advice and the movie got made! To say that the script is atrocious is an understatement, I don't think 1st year film students would come up with such drivel. I don't even want to go near the acting! The alleged director seems to come from the pre-schools end of year production! The budget for this movie would have been better spent on burgers and a few beers!

The film is a re-enactment of the Battle of Aiken, one that the Confederates won late in the war. It juxtaposes Joseph Wheeler (good rebel) and Hudson Kilpatrick (bad Yankee). The filming and sound lacked quality. The acting was poor. In the end they claim the President in Nov. 1865 was Andrew JACKSON, not Johnson. Who proof reads this stuff? Mama Thorn (Jezibell Anat) was not an historical person. It was simply a vanity role made up by the creators of the film.

Well let's start out with what's bad Dialogue music acting ten minutes without a word uttered (which turns out to be a highlight) History is wrong. How do I know ? I have a PhD in history and was in glory, Gettysburg and gods and generals You can't get the guys name right ? Hudson ?? Cmon man He was 27 this guy is at least 50 Wheeler was not in the same class at West Point Further. The average age of a soldier was 22 not 62 I doubt there were this many fat soldiers either I'd really like to say something nice about this effort Let me end with this. You seldom take cannon into a forest and expect to hit anything but trees. Jeez I see some have called this a re-enactment. It's not Nothing I'd like better if I was a soldier than to see a lot of fat old guys standing in a straight line Oh of course. It says it's January but it looks like April Now there really was a hugh Judson kilpatrick and he was Sherman's chief of cavalry on the March through Georgia. He was called kill cavalry because his tactics were suspect. (See general Elon farnsworth). So why make something like this where literally NOTHING is correct or very good ? The rifles are wrong. The artillery is wrong the uniforms are wrong If anything deserves a zero it's this sad misuse of time If you want to see Santa Claus in the civil war ? If you watch long enough there might be a fat guy with a red suit also.

My headline is not meant as a compliment. If you have the time, go to my user profile and read my review of GREYHOUND ATTACK. I started out my military career as an Air Force F-4 Phantom Weapons Systems Officer (backseater) and then as the F-4 was being replaced by single seat F-15s and F-16s, defected to the Army National Guard and spent the rest of my career as an Armor/Cavalry officer in the Guard and Reserve. I actually formed a ceremonial horse team within my Guard unit, out of my own pocket at no expense to the taxpayer. When asked to drive one of our tanks in a parade in the local area, we did them one better by having the team ride in front of the tank. As I liked to point out, "We ain't reenacting anything. We ARE the Cavalry!" Reenactor units can be a mixed bag; some Guardsmen including some of my friends also belonged to reenactor units, and some of the other reenactors are very professional living historians, but you also find some of the worst military wannabes; I hold a special contempt for this one clown who, on a network TV newsmagazine, went through his first Civil War battle reenactment and then proudly boasted before the cameras, with all seriousness and not being in-character, "I've seen the elephant!" I have to preface everything else by saying that IMHO, the greatest movie ever made-- not just the greatest war movie ever made but the greatest of any movie of any genre-- was GETTYSBURG (1993), and that it could not have been made without the over three hundred Civil War reenactment units that acted out the battle scenes for no direct pay, only donations by the production company to battlefield preservation funds. The film was great because it was arguably the most accurate reenactment of an actual historical battle ever filmed, and that was the largest battle ever fought in the Western Hemisphere in all of history. It was a faithful adaptation of Michael Shaara's Pulitzer Prize winning historical novel THE KILLER ANGELS, and on top of the historical accuracy depicting the battle itself, there was underlying drama ripe with Greek or Shakespearean Tragedy which Shaara found in the real-life historical figures who were his main characters. KILL CAVALRY has none of that. It was a movie set during the Civil War with the principal characters being real-life historical figures, and made with the use of reenactor units, but that's all it has in common with GETTYSBURG. It's amazing that my all-time favorite movie and the movie now tied with GREYHOUND ATTACK for my absolute worst movie ever released had even that much in common. The main "plot": Union General Judson "Kill Cavalry" Kilpatrick and Confederate General Joe Wheeler were best buds at West Point before the war, and now they hate each other's guts. The End. The acting was as bad or worse than that in GREYHOUND ATTACK, where one actor playing a British MI6 agent couldn't make up his mind whether he was a proper upperclass Englishman or a good ole boy from Alabama. Even the so-called battle reenactments were incoherent and numbingly repetitive. It's pretty obvious that the production crew just took a bunch of already existing film of various battle reenactments along the South Carolina-Georgia border and spliced them together hodge-podge. The reenactors' firearms were obviously pointed upward over what would be the heads of their opponents 90% of the time. About the only thing close to Shakespearean in this film is that it was full of sound and fury and signifying nothing. When I buy a video from the $5 bin at WalMart as I did for this, I usually shrug it off and tell myself, "You get what you pay for!" This is one of the few times I didn't even get my money's worth. In my review of GREYHOUND ATTACK, I at least gave kudos to the producers for having the chutzpah to release that film. I can't even say that about KILL CAVALRY; it looks like a shameless and unabashed ego trip for a bunch of reenactors with not even mediocre reenactment footage.

The film was produced, directed, and written by the same person. Takes a rare talent to do that successfully. Sadly, he is not that rare talent. This was obviously done on a shoe string budget. The direction is abysmal and the acting is robotic. It is devoid of any emotion and the lines are delivered without any enthusiasm or emotion; almost monosyllabic. The battle scenes appear to be done by re-enactment hobbyists. There is only one scene where the combatants raise the rebel yell. For comparison, the battle scenes in "Gettysburg" were done with mostly hobbyists. There is no background information provided as to the characters and one is left to surmise that the animosity Gen. KilPatrick had against Gen. Wheeler may be just the Union/Confederate thing; although it hints there may be more stemming back to their days at West Point. The film is disjointed, has low production values, and poor acting. Unless you are a HARD CORE civil war buff, give it a pass.