1234money official logo1234money

Command Ctrl

Stream the signal

  • الرئيسية
  • برنامج تلفزيوني
  • فيلم
  • رسوم متحركة
  • VSKit
  • الأكثر مشاهدة
  • تطبيق 1234money
  • FM Download
  • Games
  • Old 1234money
English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
1234money Download Appتطبيق
تطبيق
عرض المزيد1234money home light arrow
1234money downloadاستمتع بأفلام وبرامج بلا حدود
1234money downloadحمل ما تحب وشاهد بدون إنترنت
1234money downloadواجهة بسيطة وأداء سلس
امسح رمز الاستجابة السريعة للتنزيل أو
تحميل 1234money
For phones and tablets
TV
1234money TV APK
لأجهزة Android TV
1234money header navigation
1234money official logo

1234money

1234money search icon
Lucky Jim

Lucky Jim

★ 6.01957Movie1 h 35 mالمملكة المتحدة
كوميديا

Jim Dixon struggles with university work, Professor Welch's boring behavior, and his neurotic friend Margaret Peel. His misery is further complicated by his son Bertrand and companion Christine Callaghan.

803 people rated
🔇

Lucky Jim

1957

R

1 h 35 m

المملكة المتحدة

كوميديا

Jim Dixon struggles with university work, Professor Welch's boring behavior, and his neurotic friend Margaret Peel. His misery is further complicated by his son Bertrand and companion Christine Callaghan.
More

6.0 /10

803 people rated

شاهد أونلاين

شاهد في التطبيق

share

الحلقات

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex

العرض الفرعي

play
أفضل الممثلين(18)
starring avatar
John Welsh
The Principal
default avatar
Ronald Cardew
Registrar
starring avatar
Hugh Griffith
Professor Welch
starring avatar
Kenneth Griffith
Cyril Johns
starring avatar
Ian Carmichael
Jim Dixon
starring avatar
Jeremy Hawk
Bill Atkinson
default avatar
Penny Morrell
Miss Wilson
starring avatar
John Cairney
Roberts
starring avatar
Maureen Connell
Margaret Peel
starring avatar
Reginald Beckwith
University Porter
starring avatar
Jean Anderson
Mrs. Welch
default avatar
Ian Wilson
Glee Singer
starring avatar
Sharon Acker
Christine Callaghan
starring avatar
Terry-Thomas
Bertrand Welch
starring avatar
Clive Morton
Sir Hector Gore-Urquhart
default avatar
Charles Lamb
Contractor
starring avatar
Henry B. Longhurst
Professor Hutchinson
default avatar
Jeremy Longhurst
Waiter

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

R.M Phoolo

07/06/2023 13:40
Moviecut—Lucky Jim
author avatar

Kefilwe Mabote

29/05/2023 23:37
Lucky Jim_720p(480P)
author avatar

RealJenny

29/05/2023 21:45
source: Lucky Jim
author avatar

Sùžanne.Momo

16/11/2022 13:08
Lucky Jim
author avatar

Asampana

16/11/2022 02:24
We have recently read the book and watched the movie in our English class and we feel that the movie is not a faithful adaptation of Kingsley Amis' novel. The most critical aspect is that the movie is a series of scenes that don't really connect, creating a confusing idea of what the story is about. For instance, in the novel the romance between Jim and Christine isn't the main focus of the author but in the movie it is even more incomprehensible and surprising. We also believe that the movie has considerably lost meaning by cutting out all the drama of Margaret Peel and the affair between Bertrand and Carol Goldsmith, which changes the feeling towards Bertrand from the movie to the book. All that said we think that the cast was good and the film portrays very well that post-war period.
author avatar

Abbas

16/11/2022 02:24
LUCKY JIM is a likable and lively British comedy from 1957 and an adaptation of the Kingsley Amis novel of the same name. It stars Ian Carmichael - then at the height of his new-found fame - as a man driven out of his mind by the dryness of academic life and driven to exasperation by the characteristics of his colleagues. The academic setting is a great one for the farcical comedy portrayed here. If you've ever seen the Mr. Bean episode in which he creates havoc in the quiet library then you know the type of humour to expect; it essentially sees the well-cast Carmichael upsetting everyone in sight. The direction, by John Boulting, is classy and good enough to keep even the romantic scenes light and airy and above all interesting. Supporting Carmichael is a great cast including a typically caddish Terry-Thomas, Hugh Griffith as the stuffy professor, and Kenneth Griffith as the sneering colleague, but it's the lovely bulldog who proves the real scene-stealer.
author avatar

Nepal.Food

16/11/2022 02:24
It defies belief how dreadful this film is given that it comes from the Boulting Brothers and stars Ian Carmichael and Terry-Thomas. Dreadful script, desperately unfunny supporting cast - particularly Hugh Griffith and Kenneth Griffith who can suck the joy out of any comedy - and woefully inept direction. No redeeming features whatsoever. Avoid at all costs.
author avatar

Kefilwe Mabote

16/11/2022 02:24
The main ideas of the book are portrayed in the film. However, I think that some relevant aspects of the book were not mentioned. The way that Dixon sees his job, for example. The book shows clearly that he doesn't like teaching and doesn't take his job seriously. The instability of Margaret Peel is another example. In the book, she acts in a more hysterical way. We also noticed that Profesor Welch was not as snobbish and dreamy as in the book. In addition, we think that the movie's humour is far more straightforward and obvious than the one in the book. We can see that in the final scenes, with the silly chase. And why is Bertrand a novelist rather than a painter? Nevertheless, there are some good aspects of the film worth mentioning. The actors were very good. For example, Ian Carmichael, who plays Dixon, and Sharon Acken, who plays Christine, were very successful in their roles. On the whole, despite having some silly, over-the-top moments, it was worth watching.
— No more content —

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

R.M Phoolo

07/06/2023 13:40
Moviecut—Lucky Jim
author avatar

Kefilwe Mabote

29/05/2023 23:37
Lucky Jim_720p(480P)
author avatar

RealJenny

29/05/2023 21:45
source: Lucky Jim
author avatar

Sùžanne.Momo

16/11/2022 13:08
Lucky Jim
author avatar

Asampana

16/11/2022 02:24
We have recently read the book and watched the movie in our English class and we feel that the movie is not a faithful adaptation of Kingsley Amis' novel. The most critical aspect is that the movie is a series of scenes that don't really connect, creating a confusing idea of what the story is about. For instance, in the novel the romance between Jim and Christine isn't the main focus of the author but in the movie it is even more incomprehensible and surprising. We also believe that the movie has considerably lost meaning by cutting out all the drama of Margaret Peel and the affair between Bertrand and Carol Goldsmith, which changes the feeling towards Bertrand from the movie to the book. All that said we think that the cast was good and the film portrays very well that post-war period.
author avatar

Abbas

16/11/2022 02:24
LUCKY JIM is a likable and lively British comedy from 1957 and an adaptation of the Kingsley Amis novel of the same name. It stars Ian Carmichael - then at the height of his new-found fame - as a man driven out of his mind by the dryness of academic life and driven to exasperation by the characteristics of his colleagues. The academic setting is a great one for the farcical comedy portrayed here. If you've ever seen the Mr. Bean episode in which he creates havoc in the quiet library then you know the type of humour to expect; it essentially sees the well-cast Carmichael upsetting everyone in sight. The direction, by John Boulting, is classy and good enough to keep even the romantic scenes light and airy and above all interesting. Supporting Carmichael is a great cast including a typically caddish Terry-Thomas, Hugh Griffith as the stuffy professor, and Kenneth Griffith as the sneering colleague, but it's the lovely bulldog who proves the real scene-stealer.
author avatar

Nepal.Food

16/11/2022 02:24
It defies belief how dreadful this film is given that it comes from the Boulting Brothers and stars Ian Carmichael and Terry-Thomas. Dreadful script, desperately unfunny supporting cast - particularly Hugh Griffith and Kenneth Griffith who can suck the joy out of any comedy - and woefully inept direction. No redeeming features whatsoever. Avoid at all costs.
author avatar

Kefilwe Mabote

16/11/2022 02:24
The main ideas of the book are portrayed in the film. However, I think that some relevant aspects of the book were not mentioned. The way that Dixon sees his job, for example. The book shows clearly that he doesn't like teaching and doesn't take his job seriously. The instability of Margaret Peel is another example. In the book, she acts in a more hysterical way. We also noticed that Profesor Welch was not as snobbish and dreamy as in the book. In addition, we think that the movie's humour is far more straightforward and obvious than the one in the book. We can see that in the final scenes, with the silly chase. And why is Bertrand a novelist rather than a painter? Nevertheless, there are some good aspects of the film worth mentioning. The actors were very good. For example, Ian Carmichael, who plays Dixon, and Sharon Acken, who plays Christine, were very successful in their roles. On the whole, despite having some silly, over-the-top moments, it was worth watching.
— No more content —
إخلاء المسؤولية: جميع مقاطع الفيديو والصور على 1234money مأخوذة من الإنترنت، وحقوق نشرها محفوظة لأصحابها الأصليين. نحن نقدم خدمات صفحات الويب فقط، ولا نخزن أو نسجل أو نرفع أي محتوى.
حول 1234money:إصدار الرابط الرسمي 1234.money|تحميل 1234money APK|سياسة الخصوصية|اتفاقية المستخدم
© 2026 1234money. All rights reserved.Telegram
1234money official logo

1234money

English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
حول 1234money
إصدار الرابط الرسميتحميل 1234money APKسياسة الخصوصيةاتفاقية المستخدم
إخلاء المسؤولية: جميع مقاطع الفيديو والصور على 1234money مأخوذة من الإنترنت، وحقوق نشرها محفوظة لأصحابها الأصليين. نحن نقدم خدمات صفحات الويب فقط، ولا نخزن أو نسجل أو نرفع أي محتوى.