source: To Hell and Gone

For an obviously low budget seat of the pants movie, I felt it was done well. Not a great film by any stretch, but told a story that was believable. Held my interest as I knew the locales it was shot in and around being Safford, Klondyke, Willcox and Tucson, Arizona. Decent film nonetheless. The characters were believable but the heist was a bit far fetched for the loot. Definitely a situation movie that can happen on any ranch or remote homestead so it brings in the what-would-I-do scenarios. As a back seat observer, it is easy to criticize but I would say it was worth my time. I've definitely sat through worse higher budget films. Good independent modern day western genre type film.

Nothing mind blowing or ground breaking but it's a really decent film that was very entertaining and in the end we will watch it again someday. With just a little more of a budget I think this could have been a big film but again it is entertaining and bottom line that's a films MAJOR goal. The acting was very good to excellent some of the characters were unique had a Tarrantino vibe to it with a indie feel. I dont add what I would do as that would be MY film not this directors so I base my reviews on the directors vision. For a low budget it exceeded our expectations.

No big name production here but real spaghetti western style. A pretty unbelievable plot with many holes but delivery kept me going. Try it out.

I didn't expect much from this movie but it was quite entertaining. I guess the story overrode any acting problems and the Arizona locations were nice. Even my wife liked it and she normally doesn't like movies with violence.

Went into this with somewhat low expectations, but came away not feeling that I had wasted 80 minutes of my life. Not a high budget movie by any means, yet the production quality was pretty good. I didn't see the usual signs of a low budget movie: inept camera work, exceedingly cheap sets, high school level acting. The movie looked good, but to be fair, I spend a lot of time in Arizona and am familiar with most of the filming locations, so I'm a bit biased. The actors looked to be well cast, although one of the bad guys was a bit over the top. The female lead was very well cast. As far as the story goes, I agree with others that the story of the drifter was not as well fleshed out as it should have been. I would've liked seeing his part being more proactive and heroic. Overall, he was a likable character, but it was hard to tell if his actions in the second half of the movie were self-serving, or altruistic. I don't think this movie rates a "10", but it's certainly better than the low ratings here, too.

The director got a couple things right--beautiful cinematography and a likeable well developed supporting female character. Unfortunately he didn't make the lead male likeable because the character was introduced performing only immoral acts. Getting attached to his actions as a hero "to try save the day" later on wasn't as believable or easy.

Decent little hiest movie. Thought it was going to be far worse than it was. I felt like it sat right on the edge of being really good but never quite got there. If they had written the drifters charachter to be more proactive in his efforts after the action comes to the ranch, I think it would have been much better. He was acting to selfishly for me to really root for the guy which seemed like the writers/directors intent. Acting was ok. Not bad. Not great.

With a chivalrous loner ,man with no name, and a baroque sound track more akin to Barry Lyndon ,this movie is a joy ride from begining to end. It gives hope that old values of the cowboy code still exist. A must watch for a modern take on a classic genre..sans Clint.

People on here calling this "epic" or "classic" must not get out of the house much to see real movies. Bad acting, bad script. There is nothing in this movie to make you want to care about any character.