I was able to watch up to 20:37 before it was so bad that I gave up. 20 minutes and 37 seconds of my life that I can't have back.

The disaster just happened houses all abandoned , nobody checks the houses for food, already resorting to humans as food? Two " we're almost out of water" they say in new snowfall....and so this mess continues. The Asylum has made much better films....and that's sad. Poor Michael Pare'.

Another end of the world thriller that feels like an indie drama. This one hails from Canada and is bad even by the standards of this genre. Michael Pare leads a cast of people trying to escape when the Earth's crust begins to be destroyed so expect the usual gamut of high melodrama, poor FX and extreme cheese. It's also very boring.

This movie is not for everyone. End if the world-ish & scarey.

Ok its a tv movie so was not expecting much but got a lot more than I bargained for. I wish reviewers would not just trash a movie because its got low budget effects , its a low budget tv movie and it does well with what they had to spend. Special effects were actually quite well done and its quite a brutal and dark movie which reminds me of Viggo Mortennsen in THE ROAD. Of course its TV style material so as long as you keep the bar low you should be ok! Murder, cannabalism, disaster and more....Go for it, you might just be surprised.

Ham-fisted disaster-movie-with-a-message yields plenty of (unintentional) laughs from its Video Toaster visual effects, dinner theatre acting, & some of the most forced dialogue I've ever heard delivered by a straight/blank face.

This might be the worst movie I have ever watched lol. Terrible graphics, horrible acting. They run into some acid mist, and hide in a cave. Apparently mist is scared of caves and can't go into a gaping hole lol.......the actors can't even cough realistically ahahaha. And for some reason this group seems to be maybe the last people on earth. Set looked like the Walking Dead, cars all over the place lol.

What puzzles me is the ambition of the filmakers with this project. I salute the ambition, but I don't understand it. This is a film about global tectonic shifts. These are massive, continent-sized slabs of solid rock that basically float on the liquid mantle. They move about and when they catch as one rides up over another over centuries, the tension builds up and up and up. So when they release, it's like a rubber band being stretched and then released. That's the idiots guide to earthquakes for you in Think the movie 2012 with John Cusack. So lots of buildings destroyed, massive tidal waves, huge earthquakes and incredible volcanoes. So why would you even attempt to portray that on film when all you can afford is a wobbly camera, a couple of flares, and a box of matches. Oh, and a really bad visual effects computer. This would be a great attempt by a school film club.

What more could one want on a weekday afternoon! Far better than homes under the hammer or the corrie omnibus. Found myself gripping the seat and had a light sweat whilst watching(could of been the out of date tarka dahl i had earlier)

That's how far I made it into this movie. It really is that bad. Every 1/10 review here is telling the truth. I'm going to go stab my eyes with a rusty pair of scissors now.