🥇

Highlander: Endgame_720p(480P)

source: Highlander: Endgame

Christopher Lambert made the first HIGHLANDER in '86. Highlander: ENDGAME was mad 25 years later. Time has not been kind to Mr. Lambert. His face has aged - not good if you're supposed to be 'immortal' - so, many of Me. Lambert's scenes are... 'misty.' I'm not begrudging either the film, Nor Mr. Lambert - however it's disconcerting to see someone who played the same role as a strong, vital, youthful actor, and then, to see him, and try to ignore what is plain to see. I DO like the HIGHLANDER franchise, and, I think that, with this one - the last (as far as THIS series is considered), is a fine farewell to it.

I'd rather watch the first one. I mean the ending, part of it was alright. The other part i was really mad at. But I wont say what happens. The fights were alright. If your a fan of the original I dont know if you'd ie this one. But I guess I recommend this movie to anyone who likes the show or the other Highlander movies.

Highlander! Swords! Dudes fighting with swords! Sometimes the sword fighting men have witty things to say, other times when they are sword fighting they have serious things to say, see so its juxtaposed, which is also the name of an art magazine. I am not too particularly fond of the word "juxtaposed", it sounds stupid to me, here is where I can reveal that. You know what's missing from Highlander movies? It's not swords, I think we can all guess that. No, what it probably is is ice cream, not enough scenes involving ice cream. My favorite right now is pistachio, first of all it's usually a lovely pale green, then it hits you with that weird savory sweet flavor, plus there's nuts! Movie reviewed.

The movie is basically a big budget episode of the tv show. Excellent plot, but a little slow moving. It does have the greatest sword fight ever in a movie, though. Overall, worth your time, especially if you're a fan.

Somewhat better than the previous one, but still far from a well-shot movie. The special effects are lousy for its time, especially considering that it came out just one year before "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring." The story is confusing and rushed, as in the previous movie, but it's worth a look, not so much as a sequel to the franchise, but because it deepens Highlander's "origins story" and fills in the holes from the original movie. 5/10

"Highlander: Endgame" is an Action - Fantasy movie and the fourth movie of the "Highlander" franchise, in which we watch Connor and Duncan MacLeod fighting an evil immortal. They fight evil together because its too strong to fight it alone. The fight between evil and good always is a nice story and Highlander is fighting now evil with the help of one of his kinsman. Christopher Lambert who played as Connor MacLeod was for one more time very good on his role and Adrian Paul who played as Duncan MacLeod was equally good. Another interpretation that has to be mentioned was Bruce Payne's who played as Jacob Kell. To sum up, I have to say that "Highlander: Endgame" is another good and interesting "Highlander" movie that you will have a great time watching it.

I was warned away from this but, like an IDIOT I saw both the theater release and the director's cut. No big improvement w/the latter. I was never a big fan of the movies - I MUCH prefer Adrian Paul over Christopher Lambert(sp?) but I thought this was a let-down. I hope they are just following the StarTrek "tradition" of having the first movie be a let-down [the very 1st "Star Trek, the motion picture" and the first Star Trek, TNG "Generations" films were flops) and then having the rest be good (I hope.) I thought "End Game" was just awful.