Made in the light, elegant and witty ancient British style (yet with a brim of sloppiness and clumsiness), with its nicely recognizable hallmarks—such as the smooth, mild—tempered leading hero, the witty blonde, the notes of humor and drollery—and with a frolic sense of playfulness, THE DARK EYES OF London is a Lugosi vehicle and a clumsy, sloppy freak—melodrama, the gruesomeness tempered by the comedy—an almost joyous Gothic pastiche with no realization of the horribleness of what happened. I like daddy Lugosi as much as others like daddy Karloff, and when his character, Orloff, phones to set the likable blonde's fate, we get a feeling of normality—way to go, Orloff, why use otherwise the stupid Braille gimmick when you can simply call and deliver a cryptic message to seal your victims' doom? But now that Orloff's mind straightened up, it's different. Orloff sounds like Orlok and Karloff. The Dark Eyes of London (1940)

Rather bland but at least it was bearable. It had a few boring scenes and was a little too long even at 76 minutes. another very good Lugosi performance helps but it's a bit dull and i was really bored in some sequences. the finale is somewhat exciting and i liked the ending but nothing much happens and i really wouldn't call this a horror movie. It had decent plot twist to it and the performances were above average. The direction is average. Walter Summers does okay but does nothing special with the camera and the pace is inconsistent, There is no gore. The acting is fairly good. Bela Lugosi delivers another fine performance and keeps this film bearable. Hugh Williams does what he has to do but he was rather bland and his chemistry with Greta Gynt was off. Greta Gynt does fine here and was very pretty. Edmon Ryan did well here and was likable(if a bit goofy). Wilfred Walter looked funny that's about all i can say. Overall if ya wanna see this go ahead however don't expect much. ** out of 5

I can't help it. I LIKE this film. Terribly subjective, I know, but... This film is an adaption of an Edgar Wallace novel, like his "The Green Archer", "The Four Just Men", and many, many others, almost all of which have a near-byzantine plot structure amidst the thrills and chills a la Sax Rohmer's "Fu Manchu" stories. They were written in a totally different day and age for a different audience. That a great many more were adapted for film in Europe should give you an idea of their popularity. Like many Wallace's tales, there are dark deeds abounding, naturally having to do with financial gain via insurance fraud and murder, with the Evil Ringleader sitting at the center of it all, dispatching his evil minions to do his bidding, while cloaked in a disguise of (almost) perfect respectability. If you think about it, the big difference, structurally, between this and other films like Humphrey Bogart's "The Enforcer" and Brando's "The Godfather" is that the audience already KNOWS who doing the killing. American audiences even today just don't buy a racketeer being totally anonymous even to the cops(However, if someone were to successfully adapt Forrest Evers' "Take-over" for the big screen, it might change a lot of people's minds).As for me, Don Vito Corleone's hit man, Luca Brasi, doesn't hold a candle to the terrifying henchman,Blind Jake...yes, I like this film. Seen in the proper spirit, it should creep you out, too!

The Dark Eyes of London (1939) *** (out of 4) Det. Larry Holt (Hugh Williams) is investigated the bizarre "suicides" of several people who seem to have drowned themselves in the Thames. Most people think suicide but the detective believes something more sinister is going on and everything points to a home for blind people being run by Dr. Orloff (Bela Lugosi). Also known as THE HUMAN MONSTER, this British thriller will probably disappoint some expecting a straight horror film but if you go into it as a murder-mystery with horror elements then you should find yourself entertained. It's easy to see why Lugosi would want to go overseas and make this film and especially when you consider the type of mysteries that were being made in America. This here certainly separates itself from others because of its extremely dark atmosphere and rather bleak storyline. The Edgar Wallace story is a pretty strong one and it makes for an entertaining movie. The atmosphere is certainly extremely rich as the setting at the blind home is just the perfect location to match the mood of the picture. Another major plus is that the murders are a tad bit more sinister and graphic than what we'd typically see. This includes the brute of a killer with his deformed look and sinister moans. There's a scene where he's attacking the lead female character, which is quite thrilling even today as the use of shadows are perfectly executed and this was several years before the whole film noir movement. Williams gives a nice performance in the film as he gets a majority of the screen time and manages to carry the picture well. Greta Gynt is good as the girlfriend and Wilfred Walter is extremely effective as the monster. Then there's Lugosi who is certainly extremely good here. He perfectly captures the "good" character but when he switches it's also handled well by the actor. The entire "twist" in the story is pretty obvious today but I'm going to guess that those in 1939 were more caught off by it. With that said, if Lugosi had been able to use different voices and get past that thick accent (dubbing is used here) then it's clear he could have done so much more. THE DARK EYES OF London has some flaws including a few pacing issues and some ill-advised comedy but there's still plenty to enjoy here.

This is one of Lugosi's top movies. It's right up there with Dracula, White Zombie, Son of Frankenstein, and the Raven. Lugosi plays a dual role as a lecherous insurance salesman and kindly Dr Dearborn, a kindly blind teacher. Lugosi is at his sinister best as he knocks off people for their insurance money using the blind to do his bidding. In one truly evil sequence, Lugosi makes one of the blind men deaf when he discovers that he had tried to warn someone about Lugosi. I won't spoil the ending. Not to be missed for Lugosifiles.

Human Monster/Dark Eyes of London has some fine moments mingled with the tedious and the ridiculous. The cinematography is excellent in places and competent all the time. The characters are capably acted, even the monstrous Jake whose makeup, if you can call it that, is so corny it's embarrassing. The viewer must deal with the fact that the detectives in the film are agonizingly slow to see what any ten-year old could see right from Bela Lugosi's first scene; namely, that he is up to no good and that there is definitely something not quite right about this guy. In fact, one wonders why his victims don't catch on because Bela really hams it up at times. Now don't be angry at me, I'm a great fan of Lugosi, but he overplays his evil moments as Dr Orloff in the early going, tipping the audience much too soon. WARNING: POSSIBLE SPOILER!! We are, however, treated to one of Bela's more delicate characterizations in the form of Professor Dearborn. The change in mannerisms is astounding because if you are not very familiar with Bela Lugosi you might not even realize it is he playing the part. I know this is true because it is what happened to my wife. She did not catch that Bela was Dearborn! The illusion is aided greatly by the nearly perfect dubbing of another actor's voice for Dearborn. This was accomplished brilliantly and it is a shame that the voice actor gets no credit. Bela completes the illusion with gentle mannerisms that are both subtle and natural. He is completely believable in the part of Dearborn. He is also convincing as Orloff in the latter part of the film, especially in the climax when it becomes apparent how little value he places on the men he uses. It is at this point that even the ridiculous appearance of Jake is overcome by the acting and the action. Dark Eyes of London suffers from some slow moving moments and poor pacing, but overall it is entertaining and if nothing else is a fine example of what Bela Lugosi was capable of accomplishing given the opportunity.

Dark Eyes of London, AKA The Human Monster, is disturbing not just for the concept of murdering the disabled for their insurance, but for the cinematography and sets - the dark rooms, the bizarre and sharp angles of the set, the shadowy, lurching figures, the eerie organ music. I saw this movie as a child (on t.v., back in the late 1950s) and the only scene I remembered was one that stayed with me for years afterward (SPOILER ALERT), that of the intentional tub drowning of a man who was blind, deaf, mute, and paralyzed. At last, some forty years later, I saw the movie again and was amazed to note that the film still held the same gut-deep creepiness it did when I first watched it at a tender age. This, along with Island of Lost Souls, is a horror classic.

More of a mystery than a horror movie, this never really captured my attention closely, essentially because there really wasn't too much mystery involved. Could there have ever been any doubt that Dr. Orloff, played by Bela Lugosi, was behind the mysterious drownings? That was pretty clear. True, the twist revealed about the identity of Dearborn caught me by surprise, but that came across as silly more than anything else. Parts of the story, in my view, were totally unnecessary. The whole American connection was superfluous (the forger being extradited from Chicago, and the Chicago cop accompanying him to England and becoming involved in the investigation) and the need to make Jake a monstrous-looking creature baffled me. It seemed a weak attempt to introduce a horror-type element to the story. Lugosi did well enough as Orloff, managing to bring his typical "mysterious presence" to the character, although at times he frankly looked too mysterious, and therefore too suspicious, to take seriously the idea that it took a while for the police to suspect him. I also wondered about what he actually was. He runs an insurance company, and yet he's called "Dr." Insp. Holt says he "could have been" a practicing physician, and yet he is running a hospital and treating patients in a home for the blind. A bit more about the background of the character would have been appreciated. Overall, the bare-bones nature of the story was a problem. The last 10 minutes or so of the movie were pretty good, and Orloff's fate was appropriately ghastly. If you're a Lugosi fan, this is worth watching, although it's not one of his greats. 4/10

The Dark Eyes of London - aka The Human Monster, aka The Dead Eyes of London - is an excellent little chiller, based on a novel by Edgar Wallace and featuring an on-form Bela Lugosi at the top of his ghoulish game. This is a densely-plotted little production that sees the police investigating a string of inexplicable murders in which the bodies are washed up at the shore of the Thames. Their findings lead them to both an institute for the blind as well as the business of one Dr Orloff (yep, like in the Jess Franco films) who works in life insurance. Hugh Williams makes for a rather staid hero, but Norwegian actress Greta Gynt is lovely in support as the woman drawn into the case, and Edmon Ryan brings excellent comic relief as the wisecracking American cop drafted in to help out. This murky thriller features plenty of plot strands packed into a short running time. It's filled with atmosphere and great scenes of murder and mayhem, most of them committed by an excellently made-up actor who lurches from one sinister scene to the next. Lugosi is clearly having a ball and as a whole The Dead Eyes of London is demented fun. The only problem with it is that all of the prints are of a very poor, public domain-style quality; we can only dream of seeing this one crisply remastered!

This a very low budget project also known as THE HUMAN MONSTER. Director Walter Summers did the best with what he had...a star, Bela Lugosi. This is a strange story about Dr. Orloff(Lugosi), who is a doctor-on-call at a home for the blind. He loans money to desperate men and in return controls a life insurance policy on the indebted. The sinister doctor uses a hulking blind man to murder men in order to carry out a clever insurance scam. The cast also includes:Edmon Ryan, Hugh Williams and Wilred Walter. The atmosphere is very mysterious, but this movie is just plain creepy. In its day I am sure it provided a sense of horror as well as suspense.