source: Three Sisters

In turn of the century rural Russia, the aristocratic daughters of a dead colonel each have their own dreams and aspirations. Laurence Olivier's own stagey adaptation of Anton Chekhov's play has at times some minimal sets and stage decoration. Adapted from one of Chekhov's best known plays makes for an overlong and at times tedious viewing. There is something cliched in this well intentioned film does little to elevate the cliches.

Laurence Olivier was justifiably proud of his National Theatre company and this film is essentially a showcase, designed to replicate the type of ensemble playing for which Stanislavski's Moscow Art Theatre was renowned. It was there that Chekhov's 'Three Sisters' was first performed in 1901 with his wife Olga Knipper in the role of Masha. Olivier's fortunes had been in decline of late with dwindling Old Vic audiences, the theatrical disasters wrought by Kenneth Tynan and the toll taken on his health by overwork. You cannot keep a good man down of course and he summoned up sufficient strength, energy and technique to both direct this and reprise his role of the amiable army surgeon Chebutikin. The cast from the stage production remains the same with the exception of Alan Bates as Vershinin who has been drafted in to replace an ailing Robert Stephens. The entire cast is simply splendid but of course Olivier, Bates and Joan Plowright as Masha possess that indefinable 'something' which sets them apart. Watching this piece always calls to mind Gershwin's lyric "More skies of grey than any Russian play can guarantee." There are various sub-plots here but the main theme is the failure of two of the sisters to ever realise their dream of going to Moscow. Irina doesn't really love Tusenbach but will marry him anyway which makes their parting when he goes off to fight a duel even more poignant. Masha and Vershinin are fated never to be together whilst Natasha is resigned to a life with lapdog Andrei. Positivity abounds however with Tusenbach talking excitably about a healthy storm arising and Vershinin seeming to think that wars are a thing of the past! Cruelly ironic of course with WW1 a few years away not to mention another peak of human insanity known as the Russian revolution. This is a studio version of a stage production which by its very nature falls between two stools and cannot be wholly satisfactory but it is lovingly made and this piece, as with all of the plays of Chekhov, who declared that 'a writer must be humane to his fingertips', will never cease to cast its spell. Moura Budberg is an ideal choice as adaptor and had previously worked on 'The Seagull' of Sidney Lumet. Mention must be made of the lovely score by William Walton, without which no film directed by Olivier would be complete. The film was not the success for which Olivier had hoped but bearing in mind the attention span and literacy level of the average cinema-goer one is hardly surprised.

'Three Sisters' did have a good deal going for it. A big interest point being that it was directed by the legendary Laurence Olivier, and we already know that Olivier could adapt plays on film very well. Proven with for instance 'Hamlet', one of the best film versions of that play on film on its own merits. The cast promised a lot, the best known names being Alan Bates, Derek Jacobi and Joan Plowright. The play is one of Anton Chekhov's best, a masterclass of mood and character complexity. Like with 'Luther', the previous film in the American Film Theatre series, my feelings on 'Three Sisters' were mixed to mildly positive. Loved most of the cast, with one person particularly standing out, and there are a number of fine qualities. Just found it too stagy and lacking in lustre. Do applaud Olivier for even attempting to adapt 'Three Sisters' for screen, Chekhov is one of the hardest playwrights to adapt and perform and 'Three Sisters' is one of the most difficult emotionally and in character writing. It just didn't quite come together as an overall whole. A lot is done right. The cinematography is beautiful and atmospheric and actually did have a cinematic quality that was not present in the drama. William Walton's score is different from the rousing concert pieces of his and it captures the mood of the play very nicely without being too melodramatic. There are some moving moments, with the ending particularly having a staying power as ought. Chekhov's dialogue is amazing, his prose was met with a lot of scorn and criticism in his day but while wordy it has never been a problem with me. It is full of emotion and thought-probing without being overwrought and typically fleshes out the complex characters with enough meat and not too much fat. The character complexity is nailed, thanks to the acting and Chekhov's prose, the character are not what one calls "likeable" but they are realistically flawed and psychologically fascinating. The performances do convey the key themes of loneliness and desperation very well and a vast majority of them nail their character traits and psychology. And it is the acting that saves 'Three Sisters', much of it exceptional. Was particularly mesmerised by Plowright and consider her performances one of the finest interpretations of any of Chekhov's female roles. Bates and Jacobi are outstanding too. However, the stage origins show and often quite badly. While the cinematography opens up the action beautifully, Olivier's direction fails to do so. Much of it is too stagy, as well as too staid with no freshness or insight. Meaning that while the characterisation shines thanks to the performances the mood feels bland. The pathos for example doesn't resonate enough in my view. Which is a big problem for an adaptation of Chekhov. There is one exception to the acting, Jeanne Watts was too histrionic for my tastes as Olga. With the over-deliberate pace and bland mood, 'Three Sisters' already long length feels longer. The sound is muffled at times. Overall, was really taken with the performances (especially Plowright's) but there are far better representations of Chekhov around and it's not one of the best representations of Olivier either. 6/10.

Having a Russian background, I saw many productions of one of the most famous Chekhov's plays. I'd say the Olivier's "Three sisters" is the best of all I've ever seen. Even if there are some inaccuracies in details related to the Russian 19th century realities, the Olivier's n-depth understanding of the complicated Chekhov's work is amazing.

Caught this on Talking Pictures and was really impressed. I have seen the play before on stage and think of it as a dreary piece, but this version has changed my opinion. It is the most naturalistic performanceI I have ever seen Laurence Olivier do. There is a lovely performance by Louise Purnell who I recently caught during lockdown when I dug out an old box set of Forsyte Saga. It was also interesting to see a very young Ronald Pickup and Derek Jacobi. I was most impressed. Additionally it was good to see the excellent Alan Bates who had replaced Robert Stephens who was ill. Some reviews mention poor sound but everything was clear and there were no problems,

the DVD is from a different source from the American Film Theater. Its my belief THREE SISTERS was strung out for a release and so utilized American Film Theater to get it shown. maybe i'm wrong - but that might account for the funky sound. its a good movie. i have both versions. the DVD is cropped. its a desecration of Olivier to crop his movie. can't we get past doing this to sell new TVs?

This fourth and final feature film directed by Laurence Olivier is his only one not based on Shakespeare or with himself in the title role. Itself now fifty years old, hence the startlingly youthful appearances of National Theatre alumni like Derek Jacobi and Sheila Reid as Andrei and his wife Natasha. Described by Olivier as "a celebration of the acting rather than a thoroughly conceived filmic version of the play", the settings and groupings often resemble those of a German silent film while the costumes anticipate Bergman's 'Cries and Whispers'. Olivier's camera however glides about the set and cuts in lively pursuit of the Prosorov sisters as they dream their dreams of Moscow's bright lights.

A fine, sensitive filming of a fine stage production of Chekhov's masterpiece THE THREE SISTERS. A few of the actors are a bit too broad and stagey (especially the oldest sister, the schoolteacher), reflecting inexperience acting for the camera, but that's a minor flaw. What's up with the sound? I rented the DVD and the sound track is terrible for a film from this period. It's hard to make out some of the dialogue, especially when a character turns away from the camera. I hate having to strain to hear dialogue, especially dialogue by Chekhov! It seems to be a recording problem. The film was shot on what seem to be massive stage sets. This family's provincial home looks roughly the size of the Winter Palace. I'm guessing the cavernous sets swallowed up and muffled the dialogue, resulting in the poor sound quality. Aside from the deficiencies of the sound (and there's no excuse for such a problem in a production from 1970 -- fire that sound engineer!) it's a great production of a gently funny and bittersweet classic play.

It is remarkable how deeply interesting and moving is Chekhov's play about a small-town Russian family, longing to move to Moscow. Yet the playwright crafts with such affection and love for his characters that the viewer is hypnotized by the unfoldment. With a production obviously based on a beautiful stage production, Laurence Olivier co-directs with John Sickel a most engrossing presentation. Among the outstanding cast, Joan Plowright's Masha, Alan Bates' Col. Vershinin, and Olivier's Dr. Chebutikin are outstanding. The beautiful cinematography by Geoffrey Unsworth apparently utilize much of the stage sets, yet they merely add to the overall effectiveness. Few cuts are made, as the production offers a comprehensive view of this work. Part of the American Film Theatre's series of 1970, "The Three Sisters" is a memorable experience. One longs for a re-release of this fine achievement.