It's so obvious at the beginning yet they didn't totally in panic when they saw there friend been attacked and the other is dead and by the morning disappeared they didn't question themselves how wtf it makes you angry af, don't be fool by the rating!

I dont know if the director added the lesbian aspect to give this a prurient aspect or to appease the LGBT nutters but sadly it didnt work. All the characters were irritating and unlikeable - two lezzers one with teeth like a piano and the other with the usual army vest and combat troosers - she aint no Ripley or Vasquez thats for sure. Quite good creature effects and a few moments of tension but terrile script and dialogue and seenit all before nothing new here really! Annoying lesbian werewolf killers 0 Werewolves 1 I was rooting for the werewolves myself!

I've seen much worse, but it's still not a good movie by any means. As everyone else here has already said, very weak acting and script. Just another generic cabin in the woods story that we've already seen done so much better, so many times already. The nicest thing I can say is that the effects are passable, but not in any way impressive. Not that you'll be seeing much of them anyway since this is yet another cheap horror movie that didn't have anywhere near the budget it needed to do what it wanted to do, and so the majority of the movie just time-wasting filler. And oh man, can someone PLEASE get Olivia Luccardi to a dentist already? I think that gap is actually getting bigger.

good 🖤

Feral-720P

Feral-360P

Feral-480P

Feral_720p(480P)

So it was destined that producers are starting to write out any hint of masculinity in movies today unless they play the part of the villain that we all so desperately want to purge. That aside, instead of the formulaic lone female survivor, now you get two!

Making a decent -- and I mean JUST decent -- horror movie is hard. REALLY hard. But those of us in the audience who don't work in the industry don't owe filmmakers any allegiance, just because they put something together and got it released. So, for the people criticizing the critics, please give it a rest! Anyway, at first, I thought the acting was part of the problem, but really, the acting was not bad. The problem is the script. You cannot simply act your way out of an awful script. Bunch of twenty-somethings, supposedly med school grads, who sound like high school dropouts? Yep! All your favorite-lame horror movie plot devices? You name 'em, we got 'em! OK, so maybe it's not much worse than most typical bad Hollywood scriptwriting. Thing is, those medium- to big-budget productions can distract from a mediocre script with glitz and dazzle, star power and CGI. Can a tiny film like this pull it off?? Well, as I said, the acting was okay. It was well-shot, direction was meh (no suspense, not even a legitimate jump-scare), sound mixing was poor, special effects and make-up were fairly good... But the script! The damn script!!! Finally, if you think it's a good idea to use your horror movie as a vehicle for your message of diversity and inclusiveness, whatevs, but your movie better be damn good. Otherwise, you risk not only annoying your audience, but tarnishing the brand you're trying to promote. Low-budget filmmakers really should be trying to make films that push the envelope in unexpected ways, not trying to make more paint-by-numbers B-movies ready for the DVD/Netflix dustbin. Sadly, this film sits squarely in the latter category. I'll give them this: the protagonist, and later on the creature, crashing down the stairs? genuinely funny! (If that was intended, I should probably give it another 2 stars.)