1234money official logo1234money

Command Ctrl

Stream the signal

  • Accueil
  • Émission TV
  • Film
  • Animation
  • VSKit
  • Les Plus Regardés
  • Application
  • FM Download
  • Games
  • Old 1234money
English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
1234money Download AppApplication
Application
Voir plus1234money home light arrow
1234money downloadProfitez de films et séries sans limite
1234money downloadTéléchargez vos contenus favoris pour regarder hors ligne
1234money downloadInterface simple et utilisation fluide
Scannez le code QR pour télécharger ou
Télécharger 1234money
For phones and tablets
TV
APK 1234money TV
Pour Android TV
1234money header navigation
1234money official logo

1234money

1234money search icon
Where Are You

Where Are You

★ 2.82020Movie1 h 35 mItalie
DrameMystèreThriller

Un photographe sur le déclin commence à reporter son agressivité sur sa petite amie. Lorsqu'elle disparaît mystérieusement, il entre dans son subconscient et descend dans une spirale de folie à la recherche d'elle et de lui-même.

395 people rated
🔇

Where Are You

2020

R

1 h 35 m

Italie

Drame

Mystère

Thriller

Un photographe sur le déclin commence à reporter son agressivité sur sa petite amie. Lorsqu'elle disparaît mystérieusement, il entre dans son subconscient et descend dans une spirale de folie à la recherche d'elle et de lui-même.
More

2.8 /10

395 people rated

Regarder en ligne

Dans l’appli

share

Épisodes

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex

Bande-annonce

play
Meilleurs acteurs(19)
starring avatar
Camille Rowe
Matilda
starring avatar
Irakli Kvirikadze
Nicolas Yarna
starring avatar
Ray Nicholson
Cedric
default avatar
Juliette Labelle
Serena
starring avatar
Madeline Brewer
Hannah
starring avatar
Madeline Brewer
Kate
starring avatar
Anthony Hopkins
Thomas Yorke
starring avatar
Angela Sarafyan
Cassandra
starring avatar
Mickey Sumner
Caroline the Agent
starring avatar
Melora Walters
Edith the Gatekeeper
default avatar
Christopher Ashman
Henry Baines
starring avatar
Brad Greenquist
The Detective
starring avatar
Rita Taggart
Jeanne Yarna
starring avatar
Elensio
Scarlett
default avatar
Jamie Frazier
Ahiga
starring avatar
Mariana Downing
Alice
default avatar
Molly Strausbaugh
Margaret
starring avatar
Eian O'Brien
Phil Yarna
default avatar
Vincent Flores
Young Nicolas

Avis des utilisateurs

author avatar

La-ongmanee Jirayu

29/05/2023 11:33
source: Where Are You
author avatar

عبدالعالي الصقري

23/05/2023 04:16
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

선미 SUNMI

23/05/2023 04:16
This is the pretentious fever dream of an incompetent screenwriter who thinks they're saying something profound. It's full of demonstrably untrue statements and immature lines. The production value is spectacular. The acting is fine, or it would be if the director wasn't determined to make the audience say, "Deep, man." There is nothing "deep" about this movie, man, partly because there isn't a scratch of authenticity in it. The plot is predictable and diluted with shots of pretty people walking prettily while wearing pretty things. Other filmmakers have handled this subjectmatter with depth. These ones did not.
author avatar

Houray Smiley Ba

23/05/2023 04:16
What on earth made Anthony Hopkins take part in this dreadful movie? It puzzles me. Surely he must have read the script, talked to the director, talked to the other "actors". So how on earth did he manage to get entangled in this utterly horrible movie? Was it a bet? Is someone blackmailing him? I don't get it. To make a movie should take more effort than just to put together some scenes that look and sound like a 90s Axe deodorant commercial, right? The dialogue is just cheezy beyond belief, and the acting is as inspired and as credible as a 90s Axe deodorant commercial. This must be one of the most annoying attempt at making a movie ever. It reminds me a lot of the Norwegian turkey "Dis" from 1995 made by the Aune Sand. Unanimously hailed as the worst movie in Norwegian history.
author avatar

user4230313415209

02/03/2023 18:13
source: Where Are You
author avatar

Rethabile Reey Mohon

25/02/2023 21:18
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

🤴🏼Hamza Asrar🤴🏼

22/11/2022 10:10
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

Yaceer 🦋

22/11/2022 10:10
What on earth made Anthony Hopkins take part in this dreadful movie? It puzzles me. Surely he must have read the script, talked to the director, talked to the other "actors". So how on earth did he manage to get entangled in this utterly horrible movie? Was it a bet? Is someone blackmailing him? I don't get it. To make a movie should take more effort than just to put together some scenes that look and sound like a 90s Axe deodorant commercial, right? The dialogue is just cheezy beyond belief, and the acting is as inspired and as credible as a 90s Axe deodorant commercial. This must be one of the most annoying attempt at making a movie ever. It reminds me a lot of the Norwegian turkey "Dis" from 1995 made by the Aune Sand. Unanimously hailed as the worst movie in Norwegian history.
author avatar

user8062051401883

22/11/2022 10:10
This is the pretentious fever dream of an incompetent screenwriter who thinks they're saying something profound. It's full of demonstrably untrue statements and immature lines. The production value is spectacular. The acting is fine, or it would be if the director wasn't determined to make the audience say, "Deep, man." There is nothing "deep" about this movie, man, partly because there isn't a scratch of authenticity in it. The plot is predictable and diluted with shots of pretty people walking prettily while wearing pretty things. Other filmmakers have handled this subjectmatter with depth. These ones did not.
author avatar

sheikhseedia

22/11/2022 03:06
Where Are You
— No more content —

Avis des utilisateurs

author avatar

La-ongmanee Jirayu

29/05/2023 11:33
source: Where Are You
author avatar

عبدالعالي الصقري

23/05/2023 04:16
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

선미 SUNMI

23/05/2023 04:16
This is the pretentious fever dream of an incompetent screenwriter who thinks they're saying something profound. It's full of demonstrably untrue statements and immature lines. The production value is spectacular. The acting is fine, or it would be if the director wasn't determined to make the audience say, "Deep, man." There is nothing "deep" about this movie, man, partly because there isn't a scratch of authenticity in it. The plot is predictable and diluted with shots of pretty people walking prettily while wearing pretty things. Other filmmakers have handled this subjectmatter with depth. These ones did not.
author avatar

Houray Smiley Ba

23/05/2023 04:16
What on earth made Anthony Hopkins take part in this dreadful movie? It puzzles me. Surely he must have read the script, talked to the director, talked to the other "actors". So how on earth did he manage to get entangled in this utterly horrible movie? Was it a bet? Is someone blackmailing him? I don't get it. To make a movie should take more effort than just to put together some scenes that look and sound like a 90s Axe deodorant commercial, right? The dialogue is just cheezy beyond belief, and the acting is as inspired and as credible as a 90s Axe deodorant commercial. This must be one of the most annoying attempt at making a movie ever. It reminds me a lot of the Norwegian turkey "Dis" from 1995 made by the Aune Sand. Unanimously hailed as the worst movie in Norwegian history.
author avatar

user4230313415209

02/03/2023 18:13
source: Where Are You
author avatar

Rethabile Reey Mohon

25/02/2023 21:18
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

🤴🏼Hamza Asrar🤴🏼

22/11/2022 10:10
There are a few artistic fields (i.e. Fashion photography, interior design, singer-songwriter pop music, etc.) which remain to this day whole-heartedly committed to the idea of 'art' which emerged in the eighties, a kind of halfway station between celebrity culture and bohemian hedonism with a generous serving of low-hanging intellectual references. It has very little to do with the actual world, market or practice of art. It's a hazy fantasy of middle-class disalienation, where work and leisure magically coincide for a select few. Like most superficial notions, presenting it visually can sometimes ease or hide the shallowness of its conception. Here unfortunately, the painfully slow and self-satisfied visual narration is interspersed with the oral recounting of the 'philosophy' (FW: Chopra & Coelho) behind the film. The love-life of a photographer could certainly make an interesting film, and also an occasion for reflection on film, photography and their relation. Unfortunately here all you get is I a vague montage of sun-drenched Instagram reels, interspersed with self-important pronouncements about 'artistic inspiration' and 'the meaning of life'.
author avatar

Yaceer 🦋

22/11/2022 10:10
What on earth made Anthony Hopkins take part in this dreadful movie? It puzzles me. Surely he must have read the script, talked to the director, talked to the other "actors". So how on earth did he manage to get entangled in this utterly horrible movie? Was it a bet? Is someone blackmailing him? I don't get it. To make a movie should take more effort than just to put together some scenes that look and sound like a 90s Axe deodorant commercial, right? The dialogue is just cheezy beyond belief, and the acting is as inspired and as credible as a 90s Axe deodorant commercial. This must be one of the most annoying attempt at making a movie ever. It reminds me a lot of the Norwegian turkey "Dis" from 1995 made by the Aune Sand. Unanimously hailed as the worst movie in Norwegian history.
author avatar

user8062051401883

22/11/2022 10:10
This is the pretentious fever dream of an incompetent screenwriter who thinks they're saying something profound. It's full of demonstrably untrue statements and immature lines. The production value is spectacular. The acting is fine, or it would be if the director wasn't determined to make the audience say, "Deep, man." There is nothing "deep" about this movie, man, partly because there isn't a scratch of authenticity in it. The plot is predictable and diluted with shots of pretty people walking prettily while wearing pretty things. Other filmmakers have handled this subjectmatter with depth. These ones did not.
author avatar

sheikhseedia

22/11/2022 03:06
Where Are You
— No more content —
Avertissement: Toutes les vidéos et images sur 1234money proviennent d'Internet et leurs droits d'auteur appartiennent à leurs créateurs originaux. Nous fournissons uniquement des services web et ne stockons, n'enregistrons ni ne téléchargeons aucun contenu.
À propos:Publication du lien officiel 1234.money|Télécharger 1234money APK|Politique de Confidentialité|Accord de l'utilisateur
© 2026 1234money. All rights reserved.Telegram
1234money official logo

1234money

English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
À propos
Publication du lien officielTélécharger 1234money APKPolitique de ConfidentialitéAccord de l'utilisateur
Avertissement: Toutes les vidéos et images sur 1234money proviennent d'Internet et leurs droits d'auteur appartiennent à leurs créateurs originaux. Nous fournissons uniquement des services web et ne stockons, n'enregistrons ni ne téléchargeons aucun contenu.