..

source: Breach

source: Breach

Don't know what triggered all the hate from in other reviews. Maybe they're extinction rebellion extremists... Average movie. Worth a watch if you're in the mood for an interstellar alien horror movie. Acting is average Story is average Aliens are kind of like in "Prometheus" Action reminds me of "Doom"

Anti-Life is mostly a complete waste of time, space and film. In the 2240s a space ship leaves a plague infested earth carrying the future inhabitants of new earth. 180 days from their destination a skeleton crew is running the ship while the passengers are in hyper sleep. Soon the crew members start dying and killing eachother and the survivors end up battling an alien life form that overtakes and imitates its host and is trying to kill them all. The movie is badly filmed with terrible sound and poor visual effects which are similar to what bad sci-fi movies had in the late 1980s or early 1990s. The editing is choppy as well. The movie basically borrows ideas from The Thing, Alien, Pandorum and many other superior films and copies some elements poorly. Actors like Bruce Willis, Rachel Nichols, Collin Mullvey and Thomas Jane among others have little to do and have terrible dialogue and story to contend with. There are a few chuckles but other than that there are hardly any redeeming points to this. Honestly, Leprechaun 4: In Space was more entertaining and better and it was made in 1996.

Where to start... well you can tell right from the start it s low budget affair. the lack of polish is obvious everywhere. Bruce Willis keeps dinking his special moonshine from a flask.i don't blame him. by the end of this i wanted whatever he was drinking... its just bad. it get weirder and weirder by the end. and what is up with movies like this and dumbest ending. without any spoilers. if you wanted to see this for Bruce. just don't bother!

Usually I give very bad movies at least a 2, but for this....thing... I will grant myself the luxury to go for one star only. The cinematography, lighting and editing make this one a chore to sit through. The story makes no sense, the characters are uninteresting and the whole thing seems to have been put together in After Effects by a child. Willis is sleepwalking, as has become his standard MO.

I lasted 24 minutes. I knew it was bad within 2 minutes but gave it the benefit of doubt. I turned it off shortly after I spotted a cameraman in the mirror around 22 minutes. I hadn't seen this type of amateurish mistake since the 1980s. The acting is outrageously bad and would give Hollyoaks a run for it's money. I feel sorry for Bruce Willis that he feel he needs to be involved in such paff. Watched Kevin Costner a hour earlier in the brilliant LET HIM GO. Bruce should retire. This is as bad as it gets.

2 minutes in, something felt wrong, I'd pressed play because I like Sci-fi and I like Bruce. At 24 minutes I came here to make sure I wasn't alone in thinking, what the actual F. I think the BBC must have found the old sets for Red Dwarf and sold them to these guys because everything looks super cheap and the special effects are comical. The plot makes no sense, the characters make no sense, the acting is insanely bad. As a little side side point, why the hell would you have a cleaning product on a spaceship that if not diluted can literally eat through metal? Sometimes really bad can still be fun, this is not one of those times.

It looks like Willis will take any role in any movie nowadays. Nothing to watch. Just boring. Poor CGI.