source: Unfollower

The lead, "Jo," played by Julie Crisante was such a down to earth believable character. She was strong, yet showed her vulnerability which made her character so rich and real. I absolutely love this character because she had this beautiful femininity yet this grit. The technical aspect of the film was also so enriching and really well-done. The instant messages and the text messages were sometimes hard to keep up with, but that is what made it so believable!!!! This is life as we know it right now & this film captured this very real subject perfectly. I can't wait to watch it again because it was fast moving so really kept you engaged the entire time, yet it is so detailed that you just want to go back and make sure to soak in every single moment. The supporting characters were so believable, as well! The acting was stellar, the scenery was beautiful, and the camera work, lighting & overall production was very well done.

The plot is a good one, but I gave it a five-star rating because the acting in this movie is so bad. Not by everyone, but at least half the people in the cast. It was tough to watch at times.

Admittedly it did have a low budget feel to it, like a lifetime movie. But for a stalker/ obsessive type film it was a pretty good, modern story about cyberstalking. I enjoyed it.

Joanne Kelly (Julie Crisante ) is an on-line fitness trainer with about 150 followers. She wants to go big. She breaks up with her cheating high tech boyfriend and suddenly she is hacked with a stalker. Oh who can be? The guy at work who likes her? The competition? The random guy in the car looking at window through a window? This is so hard to figure out. They made the culprit obvious and did a bad job with head fakes. Made for TV and it shows.

This movie is absolutely terrible. Got to be bots giving this movie a good rating. Firstly, the acting is terrible. We're introduced to so many characters when they've already figured out who the cyber stalker might be 15 minutes in. Jo is a terrible actress and her choices made zero sense. Who puts on HEADPHONES while breaking into someone else's house? Wow, I'm being cyber stalked shortly after my ex and I broke up. I have 0 enemies and a small circle. WHO COULD MY STALKER BE? Oh please. Don't waste your time on this low budget trash.

I was intrigued right away with this movie because it was different then the same storylines that continually get repeated. It is also current touches on the dangers of the reach technology can have in the wrong hands. I also found it to be realistic. I like how the movie ended as well. I want to say so much more but I don't want to ruin it for others. I think it was well done! I look forward to future productions! Very talented group of actors, writers and directors!

It was such a decent movie. Dialogs, acting, cast were quite natural. At times I got some documentary vibes. The ending is like a horror movie, i.e., "to be continued" or "you can't have relief" style. If there were more action and a little bit of sci-fi, I would've given it even an 8.

It would have been a lot better if the lead character and supporting female characters were not all obvious men. Please use real women in these roles. I realize everyone's doing it, but it's making a lot of movies unwatchable.

There is nothing wrong with this movie except that it is too amateur. Meaning too shallow, no depth, and unrealistic story details. I could even hear fake setup background noise. Holes in the story, weak expressions, lame, predictable, boring. But simply looking there is nothing bad. Good serious topic which is stalking, cyber stalking, bullying, cyber bullying. Meaning very real topic, and few acts. Actors are not beautiful or interesting as some others but at least they are real and normal. Similar but much worse than movies Friend Request (2016) and Unfriended: Dark Web (2018) .