Randolph Scott is Captain Benson, an officer in the Seventh Cavalry who is ordered by General Custer to go fetch his girl friend from Fort Supply. In Scott's absence, Custer leads his men against the Sioux and Custer's own troop is slaughtered, the other two units, led by Benteen and Reno, decimated.
Scott returns to the fort with his fiancée, Barbara Hale, and learns for the first time about the Battle of the Little Big horn. An Army General, Scott's future father-in-law, arrives and conducts an investigation. Scott winds up with part of the blame for making himself absent during the battle.
The general orders him to assemble a handful of volunteers, return to the Little Big Horn, and retrieve the dead bodies of the officers. Scott volunteers all the drunks and scroungers who, like him, had managed to avoid the battle. The problem is that the Sioux now consider the battlefield a holy ground and it all begins to look like a suicide mission.
There are a couple of fist fights and shootings, a horde of silent, watching Indians, and a deus ex horse.
It's impossible to watch a movie like this -- the men marching around in the familiar uniforms of the cavalry of 1872, the ranks of feathered Indians appearing over the hill, the lone rider racing across the dark horizon, the captain saying "Yo-oh!" and waving his detail forward, the surrounded troopers taking cover under the wagons -- without thinking of how John Ford handled all this in films like "Fort Apache" and "She Wore a Yellow Ribbon." But there's hardly any comparison. Where Ford's community was a living, breathing organism, what we see here are actors hitting their marks and reciting their lines. The movie lacks élan, poetry, and any sense of conflict beyond the most formulaic. I could never convince myself that the characters actually felt the thoughts and emotions they expressed. There are one or two drunk scenes that are dramatic in a mushy way. Ford would have done with that drunkenness what Hitchock used to do with scenes of eating. The director, Joseph H. Lewis, made one low-budget and curiously involving film noir, "Gun Crazy." The rest of his output was as routine as this movie is.
The best scene has neither action nor romance. It's the general's investigation of the reasons for the massacre. It's a talky scene, but for once the talk is interesting. Benteen and Reno both offer their reasons for not being at Custer's side during the final moments, and both are roughly accurate as far as history goes. Scott defends Custer's character, but the others, without rancor or apparent prejudice, place the responsibility on Custer himself. Reno makes a mistake in saying they were up against the Sioux nation and thousands of Cheyenne. Only seven Cheyenne were present. (One was named Two Moons. I interviewed his descendant some years ago.) But the history, accurate or not, is a secondary consideration. What the movie needs is a unifying vision, and it doesn't have it.