I don't know about the video game bloodrayne but I know what I like and I REALLY liked Kristanna Loken as Bloodrayne because she's extremely hot and sexy and can work the hell out of a costume. But due to Loken's previous commitment of scoring the lead in a Sci-Fi Channel series titled "Painkiller Jane," a new actress was needed to fill the lead of the vivacious vampire vixen, BloodRayne. Enter Natassia Malthe- and exit any quality to the movie whatsoever. It sucks. I miss Kristanna!! This new chick that they are using as a scab actress for cheaper I am sure has nothing to bring to the table- she's not sexy in this role, nor is she convincing as a fighter. The whole think that made the first blood rayne work is missing in this version. Violence is also pretty watered down and this movie has a western cliché background to it that will leave you aching for an episode of Deadwood to help undo the brain trauma of a bad western. I can say without error that everything about this movie sucks, it has nothing to deliver to the audience it is a waste of time completely. Next time- remember what worked and expand on that, don't remove it!!! Kristanna Loken!!!!

Today I saw Die Hard 4 and BloodRayne 2. Overall I was more pleased with BloodRayne. Somebody mentioned something negative about Vampire Cowboys...well there is nothing wrong with Vampire Cowboys. I thought that this was actually a cool film. Certainly not the best I've ever seen...but far from the worst...in fact I enjoyed this much more than many Hollywoood "BLOCKBUSTERS". Even if I had to pay for this movie, I would have enjoyed it...but since I didn't pay to see it...I enjoyed it even more... ...and damn did that chick look fine... I guess in the old west, they always had supermodel vampire hunters that had perfect teeth, ripe lips a perfectly structured face to go along with their flawless complexion and manicured nails. Oh well...what I missed in the old days of the wild west...

A gang of vampire cowboys led by Billy the Kid (Zack Ward) attacks the inhabitants of Deliverance, kidnapping their children. When the Dhampir Rhayne (Natassia Malthe) arrives in the homestead of her friends to pay a visit, she finds them dead and their children missing. The lonely cowboy Pat Garrett (Michael Paré) tells that Billy the Kid is the responsible for the slaughter and offers to team-up with Rayne. However she refuses his offer and heads alone to the town. She is defeated by the vampires and rescued by Pat Garrett that saves her life. Together they team-up with the dishonest The Preacher (Michael Eklund) and with the scum Slime Bag Franson (Michael Teigen) and return to Deliverance to face Billy the Kid and his vampire gang. "Bloodrayne II: Deliverance" has a promising premise and beginning, with the saga of the Dhampir (child of a vampire father and a human mother in Balkan folklore that has vampire powers and none of the weaknesses) Rayne in the Wild West that unfortunately is not well executed and turns in a boring adventure. The stylish cinematography is very beautiful but the pace is totally inadequate to an action movie, with excessive use of slow motion, long and dull dialogs and annoying music score. My vote is five. Title (Brazil): "Bloodrayne 2: Libertação" ("Bloodrayne 2: Liberation")

This one really surprised me an blew me away with style, story, humor and sensuality. I expected a vampire movie on the order of Blade and got that, but so much more. Uwe Boll made an absolutely fantastic western in the tradition of Sergio Leone. Take out vampires entirely and this has to be one of the best Western's made in the last 40 years. While many characters are vampires, only Billy the Kid played by Zach Ward seems to be a real vampire with traditional tastes. He has made the rest of the town's thugs into lackey slaves with fangs. If anything Natassia Malthe is even sexier and more effective playing the role of Rayne that Kristina. I loved her high kicks and would like to have seen more of them. Expect more bullets than bites, more gunfights than stakes through the heart and more leather than skin on Rayne. This is absolutely in my top 50 movies of all time and I've seen over 10,000. I prey for Uwe to make Rayne 3 as well as more westerns and I can't wait to see more of Natassia Malthe in anything.

Bloodrayne 2 Deliverance is the sequel to Bloodrayne. I know a lot of people hated the first movie, I actually enjoyed it though. It was a bloody good movie and fun to watch. Bloodrayne 2 is very different from the first movie. First of all, Kristanna Loken isn't in this movie. Rayne is now played by Natassia Malthe, who looks more like Rayne from the video game series in my opinion. Anyway the movie is about Billy The Kid, who is a vampire trying to take over the west. Billy and a bunch of his vampire pals kidnap kids and take over a little town called Deliverance! This movie is no where near as graphic as the first movie. You hardly ever see any vampire fangs. There are no flash backs from the first movie either, nothing is even mentioned about Rayne's fight with her father and how she's a vampire queen and all that. I still enjoyed the movie though; it was a bit slow at times, but got better later on. I liked the Billy The Kid character, he was pretty crazy, mean as heck too. The Preacher had my laughing too. Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance is a good sequel, but no where near as cool as the first movie. I look forward to Uwe Boll's Postal movie, looks like a very crazy movie! I bet it will get banned for sure! I give Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance a Bloodsucking 7.5/10 P.S. You get a free game once again too with the DVD. This time you get Bloodrayne for PC

Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance (2007) 2 of 5 Dir: Uwe Boll Stars: Natassia Malthe, Michael Pare, Brendon Fletcher Billy the Kid and his vampire posse (yeah you heard me right) invade the sleepy little old west town of Deliverance, Montana. Rayne the vampire Orkin man sachets into town with her cheap looking weaponry looking to take him out. Rayne partners up with Pat Garret and a 'priest' to send Billy's suck squad back to the earth from whence they came. I do my best to be fair-handed with all the films I see so with that in mind I tackle the new Uwe Boll magnum opus. Boll is one of the most hated people working in the horror genre today. You can't blame the fans from virtually crucifying him with each new release. Such turkeys as 'Alone in the Dark', the god-awful first 'Bloodrayne' and the nearly universally despised 'House of the Dead' (which I actually liked…lord help me) along with his boxing with the naysayers publicity stunt don't make it easy to say anything nice about him or his productions. I'll give him credit as a shrewd business man since he manages to come out smelling like a rose no matter how much a production costs. That in mind I step forth into his newest release, 'Bloodrayne 2'. Somewhere during the supposed 100 years between the original and now our half-vampire, half-human hero morphed from Kristanna Loken to Natassia Malthe. Not to bad of an effect I thought but with dialogue this bad I'd be tempted to phone in my performance too. As has been mentioned before the camera-work is quite a bit shaky at times. The sound design is so-so. It has a decent but basic surround mix. The production design is pretty much what you would expect from someone calling their self 'Tink'. It wasn't an absolute waste of time IMO some of the photography was nice and for better or worse this turned out better than the original but it won't convert the haters and most likely won't win any new fans.

1/10 If I would drink heavily for two days in one run and then wake up to the mother of all hangovers I could still come up with a better story than this one. Bye the way, the camera movement looks like the camera man DID drink for two days in a row. If I would close my eyes and blindly pick 20 people while walking through town I'd probably pick a better acting crew than the one in this movie. Even if I ran into a lamp post because of the closed eyes. Rayne is looking sexy, though, if Boll would have included a sex scene like in the first movie I might have thought about giving it 2 stars. Naw, just kidding. The thing that bothers me the most is how weak Rayne is. If she was mankind's last hope against vampires... kiss this world goodbye. Hell, if she was mankind's last hope against a gang of kindergarden babies she might get overpowered. She gets beaten up more than she is beating up the bad guys. Half human, half vampire? In one scene you see her show canine teeth. In this scene she is almost dying and then is given blood from the arm of a friend. Very powerful hero she is... The action is slow paced, badly executed and boring. I can't remember the last time I saw such a bad fight choreography. The one thing that was actually REALLY good was the sound effects and the score. Guess that's where all the money went. You liked the first BloodRayne movie? This one will deeply disappoint you. You didn't like the first one? Well, then you probably think what I thought, it can't possibly get worse. If you want to broaden your horizon watch this one - it CAN get worse.

Rayne is back to fight a powerful "child kidnapper" vampire in the wild west. I didn't knew someone could spoil a movie like that... It is the worst movie I have ever seen! Doesn't worth a minute: the effects are cheap, no good fights, the plot is... gone... it seems you get glances to the main idea, but there isn't any. Actors? looks like they are not sure what they're suppose to do. The whole act is so unnatural and you're getting the feeling that only 40 to 50 people participated in that whole 90 or so minutes of filming. It's like the director didn't knew if he wants a western or a vampire movie, so he spoiled them both. Awful, just awful, please do me a favor, if there is any reason or good thing I can take out from this movie is to warn you: don't waste your time!

The sequel is an unmitigated disaster. This is definitely worthy of the title of modern Ed Wood picture. Well, maybe not. Wood's films are entertainingly bad. Like all the worst movies ever made, Boll's films are just dreadfully boring. This one actually has a decent premise to start with: set in the Wild West (vampires, even half ones, I guess, are immortal), Rayne (the role taken over by Natassia Malthe) must kill a vampire Billy the Kid (Zack Ward), who has taken over a small town. Now, the idea of a vampire Billy the Kid sold me on the movie immediately. That could be hilarious, right? Sigh. It didn't even feel like there was a director on the set of this one. Almost nothing happens. It feels like they were working off a script written on a cocktail napkin, a script that consisted of only the words "Billy Kid is a vampire". And has an Eastern European accent for some reason. And who prefers to feast on children, which gives the entire movie, as bad as it already is, an even more unlikeable tone. Wonder whose decision that was. This one doesn't even have the good taste to show the audience *, and the gore budget was obviously a lot lower. Gun fights are a lot more boring than sword fights, even poorly done sword fights. This is easily one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

This movie is on of the most boring movies I have ever allowed myself to view, I kept watching it hoping it will peak at a certain point. I know the title Is BloodRayne 2 or BloodRaybe deliverance, but seriously, does this movie have anything to do with BloodRayne 1??? It doesn't matter in what kind of situation you are mentally or physically, there is on point of viewing this one. I state out much more, but I don't think profanity would be welcome as a comment by whoever is in charge of maintaining the comments section. My vote -666 (not worth mentioning unless warning people who are going to be subjected to viewing this movie).