My advice is that nobody watches this, except if you wanna see somewhat sexy girl and bit of typical horror behaviors such as of one underage girl who was bit of cool. We could see various stuff of attractive girl like ass, armpits, stomach, screaming, ripping clothes, almost sexual abuse, sexy voice, sweet behavior. Also if you like modern age, you will see our typical environment and behaviors and talk, which I would call good environment. But everything else (95 to 99%) is so bad. Behavior of girls is annoying, too much evil, abuse (including sexual), fake, predictable, no real or convincing story, explanation, details. Behavior of girls was not smart or reasonable but too predictable and like of a kids. I am disappointed. Actors look like canadian.

Moviecut—Hell of a Night

I liked the visuals. The director did a great job of creating a creepy atmosphere but he is not a very good story teller. The plot was so confusing.

A spirit from a Ouija board is attacking people. Recovering from a tragedy, a college girl retreats to a remote isolated house. Two girls plot to steal from their friend. It's a bunch of white girls in skimpy outfits acting in a flat horror. These girls all talk the same and their acting is mostly amateurish. I do really like the opening scene with the two girls in the closet. It has solid horror moves despite the amateur acting. Sadly, it's a long unceasing decline for the rest of the movie. My best guess is that the casting process is simply picking the cutest white girls from their head shots. Two of the leads are basically amateur actors. The filmmaking is poor, but this Brian Childs seems to be trying for some shots. The writing is not anywhere. This is a nothing horror.

I love shaine in this movie, she always wear emo outfit, jeans and boxer . I like that scene where she's on the roof near the windows of her room, it's cute . But all in all, the movie is not quite entertaining, I didn't know where it's going through . It depends on you weather you'll like it or not.

The movie is awful! There's enough plot holes to make it look like a connect 4 game, the story what there is if it makes no sense, and there's nothing explained, then it just ends leaving you wondering "what the actual hell did I watch?" Terrible, avoid this movie at all costs!

I have no words for that movie! Waste of time!!the plot was a mess,the actors as well!! Despite the fact that I have read the reviews of the others I was curious to watch it! Unfortunately they were right and it was totally waste of time!!

Talk about a waste of 90 minutes. What did I just watch?? **Spoiler** who was the girl w the witch boots? Who was the little girl?? Umm the movie didnt tell you what was going on. Yeah, don't waste your time w this one. Go do something more entertaining like watching grass grow or paint dry.

I gave this movie 3 stars for these reasons 1. The women actresses are all hotties 2. It reminded me of an 80's B-movie minus the nudity which this needed about every 5 minutes to keep it interesting 3. The credits were definitely a highlight.... why didn't the director use those effects during the movie? Anyways this movie was really lame

This is not a bad movie. It has atmosphere, creepiness and doesn't fall into the trap of wanting to make you jump every 5 minutes; nor does it try and gross you out with unnecessarily graphic goriness either. The opening premise with the two sisters was interesting - I wanted and expected to find out what happened to them and why. We never did - why? Who was 'Raymond'? Why did he indicate on the ouija that he was not a ghost? What was his back story? We hear a tale that Blake's house is haunted by a cheated housewife. I thought this was the same house as the two sisters, turns out it isn't, but Blake just happens to be going for a weekend break to the sister's house too...which is also haunted. About the ghosts...there is a woman in witch boots (as one reviewer descibed). She hassles people in both houses - why, what is her back story? Then there is a little girl who is helpful but we never know her story either. Then there is a nutter in a night shirt with an axe, who was apparently awoken when the two girls messed with the ouija. Back story? Nope. Blake's father died leaving some money behind. This comes to the knowledge of Blake's sponging friend Chloe. Chloe gets behind with her rent, so decides to rob Blake "because she is loaded". This quickly progresses to murdering Blake via a hitman...er why? Blake's father would surely have left the bulk of his money to his wife, not his daughter. The hitman, unusually, proceeds with the contract without first receiving a deposit. Chloe goes to rob Blake's house...after first murdering her boyfriend. Why? No idea. Also, if she is capable of killing a burly young man, why did she need to hire someone to kill a waif like Blake? She then decides to go and deal with Blake herself as she has no money to pay the hitman...who is on his way there to kill Blake. So, in summary, the story is all over the place and the characters perform irrational behaviour just to drive the plot. A little more thought and proof reading and this could have been a very good movie.