0

"Not needed" comes to mind. Sure the original trilogy didn't end well but like so many other 20 year later sequels and reboots no one asked for it. And like so many others it just cheapened the original. Replacements no one asked for either. Fishburn was iconic and replacing him, replacing Smith, they just left a bad taste in your mouth. The twist on Fishburns character was also unwanted and deeply insulting to fans. But that is always what happens when you do these things. So why did I change it from 1 star to 10? Because i watched it again, and the first time I watched it I was literally bias. Why are they making another Matrix movie? We don't need another one, the first Matrix was perfect, and, though the other two were flawed, it ended. The story ended... so why ten stars? Because that is EXACTLY what Lana was saying when she made this. Remember the scene in the 2nd film where all the different Neo's are giving the finger? The finger returns, but on a second viewing that is exactly what this movie is. This movie is Lana giving the middle finger to a studio that was going to move on a reboot without them, and I feel like an idiot, because it really wasn't even that disguised. So... KUDOS LANA, that is hysterical, that is hands down the best way to deal with the studio executives that are forcing your IP into another horrible reboot.

This movie didn't need to be made, and it doesn't live up to any of the first three in the trilogy. It's like everyone phoned it in - the actors, the writers, the directors. Sad. Some of the main characters from the original got short-shrifted and that, to me, was the biggest disappointment and unforgivable. Unoriginal, unexciting, and unfathomable why someone thought this was a good idea. Three stars only because Keanu is in it.

What even was this? This was so dumb. What were they thinking when they were making this movie the dialogue is corny and the fight scenes were lame asf. Why was this even made?

The three previous Matrix, you could sense the fear the humans had when entering the Matrix or interactions with the machines. These new characters treated it like it was their neighborhood playground and had no worries of death. It was laughable!... I said characters because I actually don't even remember none of their names.

4/10 - half of it is made up of archive footage from previous installments of the series and the other half is comprised of one of Keanu Reeves' worst acting performances to date, but please Hollywood executives, take this as your sign to cast Jonathan Groff in more movies.

I had a horrible feeling 2 minutes into the film it was going to be bad. The film is very off. No Morpheus no Matrix and what is with the incessant need to show clips from the original film every minute like we don't know what they are referring to. It feels like they made this to a younger audience who have never heard of The Matrix and needed reminding with the constant references to the first. I feel sick.

First & foremost they should have left this trilogy well alone! As it progressively got worst from the original to revelations. But ultimately was a good trilogy and a great original. Now what the ???? Is this mess!? That basiclly throws half of the old film in & copies the other half with much, much poorer actors as is the nature of this very unoriginal and unimpressive shambles. Acting was badddd, Script was beyond a joke made by an A' hole & Considering it's predecessor.. it's pathetic. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone, unless I hated them.

Aside from the action scenes and a few throwback moments, this film is a misfire on many levels. It just doesn't have the feel of a Matrix film at all. Just some cool visual effects, decent action and a bit of uniqueness is what this unnecessary sequel is watchable for one time. It's not boring but also doesn't justify the length. The sad part is, the non-action or the dialogue parts don't have any excitement or energy at all. Watching them is almost a chore, while the action set-pieces hold your attention with the style and presentation. The actors did good, and that's something I can't deny. All in all, this feels more like a direct-to-video sequel made to cash in on the original franchise. Resurrections isn't really bad: it's watchable, but has its limitations. Keep your expectations in check before you watch this and you might find a good time-pass action flick for the evening. That's all there is to it. The Matrix should have stayed a trilogy, but a new film is welcome for a singular viewing experience nonetheless.

I've been waiting for this one with anticipation and I was thoroughly disappointed. I spent the first 40 minutes wondering what was going on. It was barely coherent. The rest of the movie got slightly better. But there was no real story. Some parts were enjoyable. Some weren't. But, at the end, I didn't feel like my day had been enriched by watching it and I have no desire to watch it again. The original Matrix, on the other hand, I still watch that at least once a year. This movie was done strictly as a money grab. There was no real story to tell and no journey to follow. I don't recommend it!