To begin with, let me set this straight: none of the Filipino-made horror films I've seen from the '60s and '70s have been very good. They were local produce through and through, designed to emulate classic pictures coming across from the west on a fraction of the budget. Crudely acted and slowly paced, films such as THE MAD DOCTOR OF BLOOD ISLAND are often laughable by today's standards, employing cheesy scares and an almost total disregard for the likes of pace, plot and characterisation. Yet somehow, in some way, these films have a 'feel' all of their own, something that distinguishes them from western fare or indeed other Asian horror films of the era. Maybe it's the sweaty jungle backdrops or the crude way in which attempts are made to jolt the viewer through marauding beast-men and jarring music on the soundtrack. Once seen, never forgotten is a good way to describe their cumulative effect.
THE BLOOD DRINKERS is no different. I rate films according to how much entertainment they offer me, and this one doesn't offer a great deal. The acting is okay at best, and the pace is almost non-existent, with great long stretches of nothing much happening. The vampire plot is a predictable spin on Dracula, with an anything-goes mentality that incorporates a beautiful vampire henchwoman, a crazed hunchback and a sadistic little dwarf. Apart from the old-meets-new climax, in which the vampires are attacked by a horde of torch-wielding villagers and the gun-toting local police at the same time, there's hardly any action here, other than a protracted fight sequence with the kind of exaggerated posturing you'd find in an early STAR TREK episode.
Even though this is a bad film, there's stuff going for it, mainly in the film's look. Thanks to a low budget, only a handful of sequences are in colour. Director Gerardo De Leon decided to use this to his advantage by tinting the black and white shots with various red or blue filters, each corresponding with the on-screen action. Red signifies the approach of evil, while blue charts the progress of the good characters. It's a clever touch, and one I found greatly enhanced the film no end. Elsewhere, the influences vary from THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN-style paraphernalia in the vampire's lair to the use of spotlights shining on the eyes just like in Lugosi's Dracula, Ronald Remy, who reminded me of Billy Zane, is an nonthreatening vampire, who reminded me a lot of Peter Lorre in MAD LOVE; perhaps that was the intention.
For fans of so-bad-it's-good cinema, there's a scene of a man beating up a dwarf which is fairly amusing, as well as some truly pathetic rubber bats which make the ones in THE SCARS OF Dracula look like the latest animatronic models. Otherwise, THE BLOOD DRINKERS is a film just too dated and too unappealing to be enjoyed by the modern viewer.