1234money official logo1234money

Command Ctrl

Stream the signal

  • Home
  • TV show
  • Movie
  • Animation
  • VSKit
  • Most Watched
  • 1234money App
  • FM Download
  • Games
  • Old 1234money
English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
1234money Download AppDownload App
Download App
View more1234money home light arrow
1234money downloadEnjoy unlimited movies and shows
1234money downloadDownload your favorite content to watch offline
1234money downloadSimple interface & smooth performance
Scan QR code to download or
Download 1234money
For phones and tablets
TV
1234money TV APK
For Android TV
1234money header navigation
1234money official logo

1234money

1234money search icon
The Unnamable

The Unnamable

★ 4.81988Movie1 h 27 mUnited States
Horror

College students check out a haunted house where in the 1800s an ugly monster called "the Unnamable" was trapped in a vault.

3501 people rated
🔇

The Unnamable

1988

R

1 h 27 m

United States

Horror

College students check out a haunted house where in the 1800s an ugly monster called "the Unnamable" was trapped in a vault.
More

4.8 /10

3501 people rated

Watch Online

Watch in App

share

Episodes

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex

Trailer

play
Top Cast(15)
starring avatar
Charles Klausmeyer
Howard Damon
starring avatar
Mark Kinsey Stephenson
Randolph Carter
starring avatar
Alexandra Durrell
Tanya Heller
starring avatar
Laura Albert
Wendy Barnes
starring avatar
Eben Ham
Bruce Weeks
default avatar
Blane Wheatley
John Babcock
starring avatar
Mark Parra
Joel Manton
default avatar
Delbert Spain
Joshua Winthrop
default avatar
Colin Cox
Mr. Craft
default avatar
Paul Farmer
Mortician
default avatar
Paul Pajor
Gravedigger 1
default avatar
Marcel Lussier
Gravedigger 2
default avatar
Lisa Wilson
Student 1
default avatar
Nancy Kreisel
Student 2
default avatar
Katrin Alexandre
Alyda (the Creature) Winthrop

User Review

author avatar

Hadim isha

18/11/2022 09:25
Trailer—The Unnamable
author avatar

ikmal amry

16/11/2022 04:10
I've often wondered why some authors like to primarily identify themselves with initials. In the case of H. P. Lovecraft, perhaps he foresaw how the future would be filled with substandard filmings of his writings, and it would be a way to distance himself from them! For a real cheapie, I guess it isn't bad; it's cheap, though less so than you'd think, and the monster design is passable. There are also some acceptable flesh-rippings and a decent amount of blood, at least in the unrated cut (the version I saw.) What it's really missing are characters we can bother to care about, and a tighter story with much more happening (including more explanation); don't be surprised if you find yourself picking up a book while you're watching it. I guess it must have found an audience, seeing how there was a sequel made several years later, but don't expect to read a user comment from me about it anytime in the future!
author avatar

Salman R Munshi

16/11/2022 04:10
Weak adaption turns the classic Lovecraft story into another run of the mill teenagers are in danger flick. It also suffers from a poor creature effects and a laughable ending. Film has a group of college students going to a mansion that local legend has it is haunted by an unnameable creature lurking in the attic. Unrated; Graphic Violence and Nudity.
author avatar

آلہقہمہر

16/11/2022 04:10
Many Lovecraft films stray far from the original Lovecraft story. THE UNNAMEABLE is only seven pages long, but the screenwriters crafted their story very well using the source material for the story. As for film gore, that is just "fluff" for modern horror film fans who seldom notice the underlying themes and concepts of the story. This is a good attempt to use original Lovecraft material and update to a modern setting without violating the concept of the original story.
author avatar

Anastasia Hlalele

16/11/2022 04:10
Howard Philipps Lovecraft was a remarkable author, and it's often an acquired taste to enjoy many of his stories. It's my opinion that the duller the original Lovecraft story, the more entertaining the film, and vice versa. This story is middle-of-the-road, and so is the film. It bears all the hallmarks of a standard 1980s horror film, but it has little allusions and touches that those who read Lovecraft would be familiar with would be entertained by. In-jokes, if you will. The original story was relatively short, and expanding it to feature length probably required the mortising in of the standard horror elements found in 1980s type films. There have been some pretty good films that use these elements -- Pumpkinhead springs to mind -- that even if this film uses those elements, that shouldn't detract from the overall story.
author avatar

fiona

16/11/2022 04:10
I have heard some people say that H.P. Lovecraft's works are unfilmable. I guess that I would say that they did a worthy job with "The Unnamable", but aside from the fact that another movie with a grotesque monster's property getting invaded by horny teens seems a little silly, the people here can't really act (well duh; these movies don't star Katharine Hepburn). Particularly laughable is the line "You're very brave." And if you remember the rules laid out in "Scream", you can guess which people survive here. So, this is pretty much a way to pass time. For better efforts at filming Lovecraft stories, there's "Die Monster Die!" and "The Dunwich Horror".
author avatar

Lerato Molofi

16/11/2022 04:10
If I start writing all that's wrong with this movie, it would be faster for you to watch the movie and make your own conclusions than to read my review. So, I'll just make a few notes about what's good in it: The movie is based on H.P. Lovecraft and, although this is one of the worst adaptations, Lovecraft is still Lovecraft, and it is very hard to destroy it so much to be unwatchable. Dancer Katrin Alexandre and team that takes credits for the look of The Unnamable did an excellent job and made one of the best monsters in the history of cinematography. Unfortunately, it's shown in its full glory just briefly. Few moments of naked Laura Albert. Everything else is mediocre and boring, so I recommend this only to the most hardcore fans of Lovecraft and '80s B-production horrors. For the rest of average audience this is just another crap. 5/10
— No more content —

User Review

author avatar

Hadim isha

18/11/2022 09:25
Trailer—The Unnamable
author avatar

ikmal amry

16/11/2022 04:10
I've often wondered why some authors like to primarily identify themselves with initials. In the case of H. P. Lovecraft, perhaps he foresaw how the future would be filled with substandard filmings of his writings, and it would be a way to distance himself from them! For a real cheapie, I guess it isn't bad; it's cheap, though less so than you'd think, and the monster design is passable. There are also some acceptable flesh-rippings and a decent amount of blood, at least in the unrated cut (the version I saw.) What it's really missing are characters we can bother to care about, and a tighter story with much more happening (including more explanation); don't be surprised if you find yourself picking up a book while you're watching it. I guess it must have found an audience, seeing how there was a sequel made several years later, but don't expect to read a user comment from me about it anytime in the future!
author avatar

Salman R Munshi

16/11/2022 04:10
Weak adaption turns the classic Lovecraft story into another run of the mill teenagers are in danger flick. It also suffers from a poor creature effects and a laughable ending. Film has a group of college students going to a mansion that local legend has it is haunted by an unnameable creature lurking in the attic. Unrated; Graphic Violence and Nudity.
author avatar

آلہقہمہر

16/11/2022 04:10
Many Lovecraft films stray far from the original Lovecraft story. THE UNNAMEABLE is only seven pages long, but the screenwriters crafted their story very well using the source material for the story. As for film gore, that is just "fluff" for modern horror film fans who seldom notice the underlying themes and concepts of the story. This is a good attempt to use original Lovecraft material and update to a modern setting without violating the concept of the original story.
author avatar

Anastasia Hlalele

16/11/2022 04:10
Howard Philipps Lovecraft was a remarkable author, and it's often an acquired taste to enjoy many of his stories. It's my opinion that the duller the original Lovecraft story, the more entertaining the film, and vice versa. This story is middle-of-the-road, and so is the film. It bears all the hallmarks of a standard 1980s horror film, but it has little allusions and touches that those who read Lovecraft would be familiar with would be entertained by. In-jokes, if you will. The original story was relatively short, and expanding it to feature length probably required the mortising in of the standard horror elements found in 1980s type films. There have been some pretty good films that use these elements -- Pumpkinhead springs to mind -- that even if this film uses those elements, that shouldn't detract from the overall story.
author avatar

fiona

16/11/2022 04:10
I have heard some people say that H.P. Lovecraft's works are unfilmable. I guess that I would say that they did a worthy job with "The Unnamable", but aside from the fact that another movie with a grotesque monster's property getting invaded by horny teens seems a little silly, the people here can't really act (well duh; these movies don't star Katharine Hepburn). Particularly laughable is the line "You're very brave." And if you remember the rules laid out in "Scream", you can guess which people survive here. So, this is pretty much a way to pass time. For better efforts at filming Lovecraft stories, there's "Die Monster Die!" and "The Dunwich Horror".
author avatar

Lerato Molofi

16/11/2022 04:10
If I start writing all that's wrong with this movie, it would be faster for you to watch the movie and make your own conclusions than to read my review. So, I'll just make a few notes about what's good in it: The movie is based on H.P. Lovecraft and, although this is one of the worst adaptations, Lovecraft is still Lovecraft, and it is very hard to destroy it so much to be unwatchable. Dancer Katrin Alexandre and team that takes credits for the look of The Unnamable did an excellent job and made one of the best monsters in the history of cinematography. Unfortunately, it's shown in its full glory just briefly. Few moments of naked Laura Albert. Everything else is mediocre and boring, so I recommend this only to the most hardcore fans of Lovecraft and '80s B-production horrors. For the rest of average audience this is just another crap. 5/10
— No more content —
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on 1234money are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.
About 1234money:Official Link Release 1234.money|Download 1234money APK|Privacy Policy|User Agreement
© 2026 1234money. All rights reserved.Telegram
1234money official logo

1234money

English
العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
हिन्दी
اردو
Filipino
About 1234money
Official Link ReleaseDownload 1234money APKPrivacy PolicyUser Agreement
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on 1234money are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.